A Quick Question & Answer Session On Massachusetts Condominium Law And Liability Issues

by Rich Vetstein on October 28, 2009 · 4 comments

in Condominium Law, Landlord Tenant Law, Massachusetts Real Estate Law, Rental Housing

Rona Fischman, a buyer’s agent and co-author of Boston.com’s Real Estate Now Blog asked me to answer a couple of questions regarding condominiums on her Boston.com blog which I’ve reprinted here:

Is an individual unit owner liable if someone gets hurt in the condominium’s common areas?

The answer is most likely not. This is good lead in to the concept of “common areas.” When someone buys a condominium unit, they also obtain an undivided share of the condominium’s common areas and facilities. Common areas typically include obvious things such as building entrances and exits, lobbies, interior stairways, pools and workout rooms. They also include not so obvious areas such as the space between adjoining units, telecommunication wires, and the roof. As outlined in the “master deed,” each unit owner “owns” an undivided share (expressed as a percentage) of all the common areas. But the condominium association has responsibility over managing and maintaining the common areas. Recognizing that unit owners have very little control over common areas, the Massachusetts Condominium Act provides that only the condominium association can be sued for claims related to common areas. The condominium association should have a master liability insurance policy in place in case anyone gets injured on common area property. If however, the claim is so substantial that all common funds, property and insurance proceeds have been exhausted to pay the claim, individual unit owners could be held liable for the balance due, if any, but only up to their respective percentage interest in the condominium. Now, if your unit has a private deck or porch (which is not a common area) with a faulty railing, you could be held responsible if someone fell. For all these reasons, unit owners should absolutely obtain an “HO-6″ policy for their own liability and an umbrella policy on top of that.

I own a condominium unit and rent it out to students. Am I responsible for my tenant’s noise and disturbance problems?

The answer is yes. While a precise response would depend on the provisions of the condominium’s bylaws, typically, a unit owner is responsible for the actions of tenants. Most often, a condominium’s bylaws and house rules are binding on unit owners, resident family members and tenants. If a tenant violates a house rule — by making excessive noise — the unit owner is responsible for all consequences. The condominium association can require the unit owner to evict the tenant; if the unit owner fails or refuses, the condominium association may be able to take separate legal action against the owner and levy stiff fines. If the bylaws provide, the unit owner may be responsible for reimbursing the condo for legal fees and other expenses incurred in connection with his tenant’s eviction. Disgruntled unit owners can also pursue “nuisance” claims against unit owners who rent to noisy tenants. This is a tricky issue with an absentee unit owner who cannot verify the nature of the complaints. Surely, however, renting to noisy tenants will earn you no favors with your fellow unit owners.

Condominium Living 101

My advice to folks considering purchasing a condominium is to recognize that you are buying into a rather unique form of ownership and community. You will be giving up certain rights taken for granted in del bocasingle family dwelling life — the right to absolute silence, privacy, and control over all aspects of the property — in exchange for perhaps more amenities, convenience, less maintenance, and better location and price. In some cases, you will also be entering into the uniquely democratic (or in some condos, totalitarian) form of governance, rife with politics, fighting and name-calling–think that Seinfeld episode down at the Del Boca Vista Condos. But seriously, the majority of condominiums are well run. But before you buy, it’s imperative that you and your real estate attorney thoroughly review the condominium documents and budget to ensure you’re not buying into a Seinfeld-esque nightmare.

  • ken d

    We as 5 owners of a 34 unit condo complex have experienced after some roof construction a severe ice buildup at our front doors. The board refuses to install electric wires in the downspouts to help aliviate the problem. This is common area and it is our feeling that as a safety issue and an access to our property issue that they the Board is responsible for correcting the problem. They say that we are a minority and don’t have to share the burden of responsibility with the other units. What can we do?

  • http://Massachussettescondolaw David Comtois

    I own a condo in a 12 unit complex. The acting treasurer held a meeting with the owners of units occupied 7, and voted me in as treasurer, and he assumed the presidents position. There was also a secretary elected. The book work was never turned over to me, eight months now and we 4 of the seven present owners want to remove him. We cannot get a full list of owners from the president/treasurer as some of the units are owned by individuals not present. He is holding dual positions and dictating all functions. The association is always broke with no reserves. My question is do all owners have to be present for a legal removal of the president. And what would be the steps necessary to do so ?

  • maurice butler

    Hi, I own a detched condominium. Its a two bed room condo and I was wondering, what rights i have for parking. I only have a one car drive way. I use to be able to park in the street, infront of my house. Now they dont want us parking there anymore. They are towing cars away that are parked on the street. When I called the management, they told me to park in the common areas.One of the common areas, is 200 feet from my house. The other one is more then twice the distance.At times, they are all full. What do i do?

  • Mercier12

    Are the Trustees allowed to make a decision like what follows?

    4 connected units the basements were flooded during a storm, the trustees one of which owned one of the units voted not to have flood insurance because of the cost, so they decided at the cost of the trust, to 1. have sump pumps installed in these 4 units, 2. all units were repaired and updated (new rugs, painting, woodwork,
    at no cost to the unit owners. I believe that even if there was flood insurance, the unit ownere would still have to contact their own personal insurance companies, and they would have paid some or most of the cost for the interior repairs.
    I feel that the trustees made an illegal move making this decision.

    Right or wrong? reply,

Previous post:

Next post:

Real Time Analytics