Landlords Cannot Refuse to Rent to Criminals, Says HUD

by Rich Vetstein on May 3, 2016 · 3 comments

in Housing Discrimination, HUD, Landlord Tenant Law, Massachusetts Real Estate Law, Premises Liability, Rental Housing

criminal-background-checkWidespread Racial Disparities In Criminal Justice System Justifies New Policy

Last week the Obama administration released new controversial Fair Housing guidelines telling the nation’s landlords that it may be discriminatory for them to refuse to rent to those with criminal records. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) says refusing to rent based on a criminal record is a form of racial discrimination, due to racial imbalances in the U.S. justice system, despite the fact that criminal history is not a protected class under the federal Fair Housing Act.

“The Fair Housing Act prohibits both intentional housing discrimination and housing practices that have an unjustified discriminatory effect because of race, national origin, or other protected characteristics,” say HUD’s newly-released guidelines. “Because of widespread racial and ethnic disparities in the U.S. criminal justice system, criminal history-based restrictions on access to housing are likely disproportionately to burden African-Americans and Hispanics. While the Act does not prohibit housing providers from appropriately considering criminal history information when making housing decisions, arbitrary and overbroad criminal history-related bans are likely to lack a legally sufficient justification.” About 25 percent of Americans have some kind of criminal record, which can range from felony convictions to arrests that never led to charges.

HUD says that landlords may be allowed to bar those with criminal records, but they will have to prove that such a policy is necessary for protecting the safety of other tenants, and designed to avoid illegal discrimination. The new guidance recommends that landlords consider factors such as the severity of the criminal history and how long ago it occurred.

Practice Pointer: Blanket prohibitions denying applicants with criminal histories will get landlords into major trouble under the new HUD policy.

 HUD’s revised guidance discusses the three steps used to analyze claims that a housing provider’s use of criminal history to deny housing opportunities results in a discriminatory effect in violation of the Act.
  • Evaluating whether the criminal history policy or practice has a discriminatory effect
  • Evaluating whether the challenged policy or practice is necessary to achieve a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest
  • Evaluating whether there is a less discriminatory alternative

Policy Places Burden On Small Landlords

I’m all for giving people a second chance at life, but the major problem with this policy is that it puts the onus and burden on the small landlord to do the criminal history check and then figure out how severe the offense is and what the underlying circumstances are. Also the policy does not advise a landlord exactly how old a crime is to be considered “too old.”

In Massachusetts, a CORI (Criminal Offender Record Information) report contains only the basic of information of the offense such as the date of arrest/conviction, disposition, court and sentence, if any. There is nothing in the CORI report showing the underlying facts of the crime and it does not include police reports. Thus, for a charge of open and lewd conduct, a landlord does not know whether this is a serious offense or just a college kid urinating in an alley. Under the new HUD policy, landlords now have the burden of playing criminal investigator and assessing whether a crime is not truly serious.

Also, please remember that under the so-called Mrs. Murphy exemption, the federal Fair Housing Act does not apply to owner-occupied rental properties of up to 4 units.

What Now?

So how are landlords going to navigate this new policy? Well, first I would expect that risk-adverse landlords will cut down or stop requesting criminal history information all together. Of course, this puts landlords in a dilemma because they retain a legal duty to keep residents safe, and if they rent out to a known sexual offender, for example, who attacks another resident, they can be sued for millions.

For those who still ask for criminal record information, they will have to offer an applicant the opportunity to explain the circumstances of their arrest/conviction before making a final decision. As with all rental application decisions, it’s best to make the decision rest on financial considerations such as credit, income, and employment.

If you need guidance navigating this new policy, feel free to contact me at rvetstein@vetsteinlawgroup.com.

  • urhdhunter urhdhunter

    Vet the landlord provides reports on the landlord if they have a history of evicting people, history of health and safety violation citations/complaints and if the property is in foreclosure. The service is adding users at an unprecedented pace. Everyone wants to know who they’re renting from. I some cases violations could be a breach of the lease and free you with damages. All for just a minor fee and instant results. The also have vettheattorney to make sure the attorney is competent in their field, cases won/cases lost, ethics, integrity. This attorney’s company for example Title hub closing services, LLC was ordered to close the LLC yet the attorney continues to run it and is under investigation as well as some lies and misrepresentations on his web site. Most of these blogs he’s plagiarized when checked. He is not on the committees he claims to be. He’s had municipal liens, etc. It’s a matter of time with him so please investigate carefully. Using vet the landlord gives you the information to make a good decision and allows to know what kind of person your landlord is. They vet, now you can vet them. Don’t bet with a home, just Vet. Risa Goodman VTA, Vet the Attorney.

  • Pamela Kinzey

    First we have to allow tenants to have dogs for their emotional needs, then we have to allow them to commit crimes. Next we won’t be allowed to discriminate because of lack of income. I’ll be selling my duplexes soon. I have enough trouble finding tenants that can get along together as it is.

  • mia culpa

    Laws for tenants rights conflict with laws imposed on landlords, this alone should be a class action since unfair and discriminatory against landlords. States keep passing the buck due to bad economy.

Previous post:

Next post:

Real Time Analytics